OFFENSIVE SECURITY FOR ORGANIZATIONS
OPSEQ uses AI agents and human oversight to investigate your public footprint, validate agreed attack paths, and deliver an evidence-backed plan to reduce your exposure.
01 / OUR SERVICES
Start with an exposure assessment or a specific risk you need answered. Each engagement has an agreed scope, a human lead, and defined deliverables.
Map the outside view of your organization: domains, internet-facing services, public documents, repositories, and visible employee or vendor relationships. Identify the information and entry points an attacker could use.
UNDERSTAND WHAT IS EXPOSEDExplore the serviceInvestigate a specific risk, such as access to a sensitive application or an exposed account boundary. Test the agreed path and document what is confirmed, what is inferred, and what remains untested.
ESTABLISH WHAT IS POSSIBLEExplore the serviceReturn after a fix, launch, acquisition, or other meaningful change. Recheck the agreed findings and look for new exposure within the updated scope. Set the cadence around your business.
VERIFY WHAT HAS CHANGEDExplore the serviceFOLLOW THE CONNECTIONS
A domain leads to an application. A public document reveals a relationship. An overlooked service raises an ownership question. OPSEQ connects the outside view so your team can decide where to look closer.
Explore the outside viewPublic infrastructure
Domains, cloud, applications, and APIs
Information and code
Public documents and repository exposure
Identity and brand
Account clues and recognized public presence
Business connections
Vendors, acquisitions, and ownership gaps
The assessment can focus on systems, information, people, or external relationships.
02 / WHAT YOU RECEIVE
For the agreed scope, your team gets the evidence to make a decision and the detail to take action.
Scope and coverage are documented with the findings. Retesting is included only when specified in your engagement.
A finding.
A way forward.
The assets, public information, and relationships identified in scope, with source references and ownership questions for your team to resolve.
Affected assets, observed behavior, supporting evidence, and potential business impact. Confirmed results are separated from hypotheses and testing limitations.
Recommended fixes ordered by risk, with the reasoning, suggested responsible teams, and a way to check whether each change addresses the finding.
A concise leadership summary and a technical handoff so decision-makers understand the exposure and the people doing the work know where to start.
FIND YOUR STARTING POINT
Explore the exposure that matters to your organization, from internet-facing infrastructure to public information and business relationships.
Understand the cloud-hosted services and public endpoints visible outside your organization, with ownership and validation boundaries clearly defined.
Explore solutionReview publicly visible account patterns, sign-in surfaces, and identity clues that could shape an attacker’s understanding of your organization.
Explore solutionReview the public domain and brand footprint around your organization, with evidence that helps distinguish ownership questions from suspicious activity.
Explore solutionAssess agreed public information about organizational leaders and connect relevant exposure to practical business and personal-data reduction decisions.
Explore solutionUnderstand the visible vendor and partner relationships around your public footprint, then identify the ownership and assurance questions they raise.
Explore solutionReview agreed public repositories, documents, and content for organizational information that deserves removal, ownership review, or further investigation.
Explore solutionBUILT AROUND YOUR NEXT MOVE
A useful engagement starts with the decision your team needs to make.
Understand what a new product, application, or public presence exposes before the next milestone.
Bring an outside view to an acquisition and identify questions for diligence and integration.
Connect evidence to business impact so your team can decide which exposure to address first.
Revisit the original finding and document what changed, what remains, and what was tested.
03 / AN EXAMPLE OPERATION
Explore how an exposed application becomes an investigated finding and a recommended fix. The same evidence-first approach guides each engagement.
Connect public-facing assets, identities, and dependencies into a picture of your organization’s external exposure.
Investigate how individual weaknesses could connect, with validation bounded by the rules of the engagement.
Rank the findings, explain the recommended fixes, and hand them to your team. Retesting follows when included in the agreed scope.
01↳Scope loaded: example.org
02↳Public application mapped
03↳Identity boundary identified
01↳Candidate path selected
02↳Access boundary evaluated
03↳Evidence attached for review
01↳Finding prioritized by impact
02↳Remediation guidance prepared
03↳Readout and retest criteria prepared
A SIMPLIFIED EXAMPLE OF THE WORKFLOW. NO LIVE SCANNING OR CUSTOMER DATA.
04 / WHAT TO EXPECT
AI expands the research.
A human lead owns the assessment.
Choose the business concern, assets, permitted techniques, and exclusions. The written proposal sets the deliverables, timeline, fee, and communication plan before work begins.
AI agents assist discovery and research. A human lead reviews the evidence, directs validation, and keeps activity within the approved rules. Urgent findings follow the agreed escalation process.
Walk through the evidence, business implications, and recommended fixes with your team. Your owners take the remediation forward; OPSEQ makes the findings actionable.
Agree which findings to retest and when. A follow-up records what changed, what still needs attention, and anything outside the test’s coverage. Retesting and recurring reviews are scoped explicitly.
05 / BEFORE WE BEGIN
OPSEQ is an AI-assisted offensive security service. We examine your organization from the outside, connect public exposure to potential attack paths, and validate the risks you authorize us to test. You receive a documented assessment and a prioritized plan your team can act on.
Organizations that need a clearer outside view of their security: before a launch or acquisition, after a significant infrastructure change, or when their team needs an independent assessment of a specific risk. The scope can focus on one concern or a broader organizational footprint.
The starting point is an outside-in exposure assessment. A penetration test examines agreed systems through authorized hands-on testing; that depth of validation must be specified in the engagement. Automated discovery supports the work, while the deliverable is a reviewed assessment with evidence, context, and next steps.
Your main concern, the organization or assets you want assessed, and a point of contact. Before testing, we agree on authorization, asset ownership, exclusions, access requirements, and handling of evidence. Credentials and sensitive system details do not belong in the initial inquiry.
Both depend on the size of the scope and the depth of validation. The proposal sets the schedule, fee, deliverables, and any retesting before you commit. A focused question helps keep the engagement useful and bounded.
No. Agents assist research and repeatable discovery within the engagement’s boundaries. Human review directs validation and evaluates findings. Social engineering, internal access, and testing third-party systems require explicit inclusion and the appropriate authorization.
Your team receives the findings, action plan, and readout. You decide which changes to implement. We can scope a retest or recurring review to revisit that exposure. An assessment covers the agreed assets and period; it is not continuous monitoring, incident response, or a guarantee that every weakness has been found.
FROM THE FIELD GUIDE
Understand what an outside-in assessment examines, how evidence becomes a finding, and what a useful handoff should give your team.
Explore resourcePrepare the decisions, asset boundaries, permissions, contacts, and deliverable expectations that turn an initial security concern into a focused assessment.
Explore resourceA fictional staging application example shows how to document an observation, explain uncertainty, assign remediation, and define a meaningful retest.
Explore resourceYOUR NEXT MOVE
Tell us what you need to protect. We’ll define the right assessment together.
Discuss an assessment